CGCNN+P
Predictions
ML vs DFT Formation Energies
Loading formation energy parity data...
ML vs DFT Convex Hull Distance
Loading convex hull distance parity data...
Convex hull distance prediction errors projected onto elements
1 H 0.50
2 He 0.00
3 Li 0.15
4 Be 0.26
5 B 0.35
6 C 0.29
7 N 0.41
8 O 0.49
9 F 0.50
10 Ne 0.00
11 Na 0.18
12 Mg 0.19
13 Al 0.32
14 Si 0.38
15 P 0.29
16 S 0.41
17 Cl 0.42
18 Ar 0.00
19 K 0.19
20 Ca 0.20
21 Sc 0.22
22 Ti 0.35
23 V 0.43
24 Cr 0.28
25 Mn 0.33
26 Fe 0.38
27 Co 0.34
28 Ni 0.29
29 Cu 0.21
30 Zn 0.24
31 Ga 0.25
32 Ge 0.29
33 As 0.27
34 Se 0.33
35 Br 0.38
36 Kr 0.00
37 Rb 0.18
38 Sr 0.19
39 Y 0.20
40 Zr 0.26
41 Nb 0.32
42 Mo 0.26
43 Tc 0.17
44 Ru 0.28
45 Rh 0.25
46 Pd 0.22
47 Ag 0.17
48 Cd 0.18
49 In 0.23
50 Sn 0.24
51 Sb 0.23
52 Te 0.32
53 I 0.32
54 Xe 0.01
55 Cs 0.18
56 Ba 0.19
57 La 0.20
58 Ce 0.18
59 Pr 0.17
60 Nd 0.17
61 Pm 0.16
62 Sm 0.17
63 Eu 0.16
64 Gd 0.17
65 Tb 0.19
66 Dy 0.19
67 Ho 0.19
68 Er 0.19
69 Tm 0.20
70 Yb 0.18
71 Lu 0.19
72 Hf 0.25
73 Ta 0.38
74 W 0.22
75 Re 0.24
76 Os 0.25
77 Ir 0.29
78 Pt 0.26
79 Au 0.22
80 Hg 0.15
81 Tl 0.18
82 Pb 0.22
83 Bi 0.18
84 Po 0.00
85 At 0.00
86 Rn 0.00
87 Fr 0.00
88 Ra 0.00
89 Ac 0.15
90 Th 0.31
91 Pa 0.19
92 U 0.26
93 Np 0.73
94 Pu 0.29
95 Am 0.00
96 Cm 0.00
97 Bk 0.00
98 Cf 0.00
99 Es 0.00
100 Fm 0.00
101 Md 0.00
102 No 0.00
103 Lr 0.00
104 Rf 0.00
105 Db 0.00
106 Sg 0.00
107 Bh 0.00
108 Hs 0.00
109 Mt 0.00
110 Ds 0.00
111 Rg 0.00
112 Cn 0.00
113 Nh 0.00
114 Fl 0.00
115 Mc 0.00
116 Lv 0.00
117 Ts 0.00
118 Og 0.00
57-71 La-Lu Lanthanides
89-103 Ac-Lr Actinides
Trained By
Model Info
- Model Version v0.1.0
- Model Type GNN
- Targets E
- Openness OSOD
- Train Task S2RE
- Test Task IS2RE
- Trained for Benchmark Yes
Training Set
MP v2022.10.28: 155k structures
Description
This work proposes simple structure perturbations to augment CGCNN's training data of relaxed structures with randomly perturbed ones resembling unrelaxed structures that are mapped to the same DFT final energy during training.

Long
The model is essentially taught the potential energy surface (PES) is a step-function that maps each valley to its local minimum. The expectation is that during testing on unrelaxed structures, the model will predict the energy of the nearest basin in the PES. The authors confirm this by demonstrating a lowering of the energy error on unrelaxed structures.
Hyperparameters
- Perturbations:
5 - graph_construction_radius:
5 - max_neighbors:
null
Dependencies
- aviary https://github.com/CompRhys/aviary/releases/tag/v0.1.0
- torch 1.11.0
- torch-scatter 2.0.9
- numpy 1.24.0
- pandas 1.5.1